HighCommander4 wrote: @kadircet perhaps you might be able to pick up this review?
Or, barring of a full review, your opinion on the directional question in [this comment](https://reviews.llvm.org/D93829#4654786) would be appreciated as well: > how would you feel about proceeding with the patch in its current state, with > the memory usage increase brought down from 8.2% to 2.5% thanks to the > combination of the simple lookup optimization + RefKind filtering, and > leaving the "deep lookup optimization" to be explored in a future change? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77556 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
