github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 101acff2e5df21378b5764660afc0ec84ce6a1a6
f3e4787973daf1cd278a9615960bbb4b31d3c0c0 --extensions hpp --
libunwind/src/UnwindCursor.hpp
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/libunwind/src/UnwindCursor.hpp b/libunwind/src/UnwindCursor.hpp
index 02cbd9891e..ff518b1eb1 100644
--- a/libunwind/src/UnwindCursor.hpp
+++ b/libunwind/src/UnwindCursor.hpp
@@ -2932,8 +2932,8 @@ bool UnwindCursor<A,
R>::setInfoForSigReturn(Registers_x86_64 &) {
// This special code path is a fallback that is only used if the trampoline
// lacks proper (e.g. DWARF) unwind info.
const uint8_t amd64_linux_sigtramp_code[9] = {
- 0x48, 0xc7, 0xc0, 0x0f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // mov rax, 15
- 0x0f, 0x05 // syscall
+ 0x48, 0xc7, 0xc0, 0x0f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // mov rax, 15
+ 0x0f, 0x05 // syscall
};
const size_t code_size = sizeof(amd64_linux_sigtramp_code);
@@ -2943,7 +2943,8 @@ bool UnwindCursor<A,
R>::setInfoForSigReturn(Registers_x86_64 &) {
if (!isReadableAddr(pc))
return false;
// If near page boundary, check the next page too.
- if (((pc + code_size - 1) & 4095) != (pc & 4095) && !isReadableAddr(pc +
code_size - 1))
+ if (((pc + code_size - 1) & 4095) != (pc & 4095) &&
+ !isReadableAddr(pc + code_size - 1))
return false;
const uint8_t *pc_ptr = reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t *>(pc);
@@ -2991,7 +2992,8 @@ int UnwindCursor<A,
R>::stepThroughSigReturn(Registers_x86_64 &) {
// __u64 ip; // 16
// ...
// };
- const size_t idx_map[17] = {13, 12, 14, 11, 9, 8, 10, 15, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 16};
+ const size_t idx_map[17] = {13, 12, 14, 11, 9, 8, 10, 15, 0,
+ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 16};
for (int i = 0; i < 17; ++i) {
uint64_t value = _addressSpace.get64(sigctx + idx_map[i] * 8);
@@ -2999,9 +3001,10 @@ int UnwindCursor<A,
R>::stepThroughSigReturn(Registers_x86_64 &) {
}
// The +1 story is the same as in DwarfInstructions::stepWithDwarf()
- // (search for "returnAddress + cieInfo.isSignalFrame" or "Return address
points to the next instruction").
- // This is probably not the right place for this because this function is
not necessarily used
- // with DWARF. Need to research whether the other unwind methods have the
same +-1 situation or
+ // (search for "returnAddress + cieInfo.isSignalFrame" or "Return address
+ // points to the next instruction"). This is probably not the right place for
+ // this because this function is not necessarily used with DWARF. Need to
+ // research whether the other unwind methods have the same +-1 situation or
// are off by one.
_registers.setIP(_registers.getIP() + 1);
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103473
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
