================
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
-namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 open 2024-07-30
+namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 review 2024-07-30
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
> you can update the test separately
Well the issue is I’m not entirely sure how we should handle this case: The
suggested resolution is different from the proposed resolution (we currently
implement the former), and @cor3ntin said it would be better to wait and not
make a change to the implementation for now
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101448#issuecomment-2307838729), so
my understanding is that saying that we implement the 2024-07-30 resolution
would be the most accurate?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106299
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
