github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 3364284d87035eaac9662d345d4ddee2714f8fd7
811bfc9011adf48bb22cce3e0ece0f7539bd095c --extensions cpp --
clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
clang/test/SemaTemplate/concepts-out-of-line-def.cpp
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
index 6e31cc6f87..1b8fd5bf70 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
@@ -983,10 +983,10 @@ static const Expr
*SubstituteConstraintExpressionWithoutSatisfaction(
// otherwise reference the AssociatedDecl of the template arguments,
which
// is, in this case, the template declaration.
//
- // However, as we are in the process of comparing potential
re-declarations,
- // the canonical declaration is the declaration itself at this point.
- // moment. So if we didn't expand these packs, we would end up with an
- // incorrect profile difference because we will be profiling the
+ // However, as we are in the process of comparing potential
+ // re-declarations, the canonical declaration is the declaration itself
at
+ // this point. moment. So if we didn't expand these packs, we would end
up
+ // with an incorrect profile difference because we will be profiling the
// canonical types!
//
// FIXME: Improve the "no-transform" machinery in FindInstantiatedDecl so
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102131
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
