cor3ntin wrote: the date changed. weird! the resolution did not
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024, 20:59 Vlad Serebrennikov ***@***.***> wrote: > I think the dr test already say "Clang 20 implements 2024-07-30 > resolution" which is correct > > While I understand what you're referring to (author's claim that the > example is nonsense and should be rejected), if you open > https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2917.html, the only resolution > there is dated 2024-08-16. > > If for whatever reason we think that we should stick to that instead of > considering newer proposed resolution, I'm happy with a simple replacement > of open with review in the status. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101448#issuecomment-2307646855>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKX7632RFGI2VOAS4H3WK3ZS6A77AVCNFSM6AAAAABLZVR77OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBXGY2DMOBVGU> > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101448 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
