dschuff wrote: I'm fine with calling this feature fp16 (I like it better than half-precision anyway) but I also wanted to point out that consistency with the spec is probably more important in the long term than consistency with V8, because the V8 flags eventually disappear (once V8 enabled support for a feature by default), whereas the flags for the tools will probably persist for the long term. Of course the spec names will also go away once the feature is merged into the spec (until we have profiles, I guess).... But just something to consider. For that matter, maybe we should make the feature names a tool-convention to line up with wasm-tools. I think feature naming is already kind of a mess, maybe we can avoid making it worse.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105434 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
