AaronBallman wrote: > ``` > $ ./build/bin/clang -fsyntax-only -DHUGE 2>&1 > clang/test/Parser/parser_overflow.c -fbracket-depth=2048 > Segmentation fault > > $ ./build/bin/clang -fsyntax-only -DHUGE 2>&1 > clang/test/Parser/parser_overflow.c -fbracket-depth=2045 > clang/test/Parser/parser_overflow.c:11:2049: fatal error: bracket nesting > level exceeded maximum of 2045 > Segmentation fault > > $ ./build/bin/clang -fsyntax-only -DHUGE 2>&1 > clang/test/Parser/parser_overflow.c -fbracket-depth=2040 > clang/test/Parser/parser_overflow.c:11:2044: fatal error: bracket nesting > level exceeded maximum of 2040 > clang/test/Parser/parser_overflow.c:11:2044: note: use -fbracket-depth=N to > increase maximum nesting level > 1 error generated. > ``` > > Any number under 2040 is fine on my debug build. Between 2040 and 2050, seems > random.
lol, so we were very close with 2048. :-D Thank you! > @AaronBallman should we back to the 1024 option? I'm hoping we can find a way to reduce the stack usage rather than change the option, but 1024 is a good fallback https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104717 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
