================
@@ -5637,6 +5638,27 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self, TypeTrait
UTT,
return false;
case UTT_IsTriviallyEqualityComparable:
return isTriviallyEqualityComparableType(Self, T, KeyLoc);
+ case UTT_IsImplicitLifetime: {
+ DiagnoseVLAInCXXTypeTrait(Self, TInfo,
+ tok::kw___builtin_is_implicit_lifetime);
+ QualType UnqualT = T->getCanonicalTypeUnqualified();
+ if (UnqualT->isScalarType())
----------------
Endilll wrote:
> Honestly, I have no idea. Given that we recently came to agreement that other
> stakeholders should have a say about our extensions, I wonder what libc++
> thinks of this. CC @AaronBallman @ldionne @philnik777
Me, @AaronBallman, and @philnik777 discussed that yesterday during Aaron's
office hours. As I understood it, there are no concerns from libc++ side here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101807
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
