RKSimon added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28018#639765, @GGanesh wrote:
> Fallback to CK_BTVER1 is ok but not to CK_BTVER2. This is not possible > because of the partial YMM writes. They have different behavior for znver1 > with AVX and their legacy SIMD counterparts. So, as of now leaving them to > alphabetical order. That makes sense for the llvm patch, but for this clang patch in X86TargetInfo::initFeatureMap we don't need to handle those behaviour features just the instruction set features which we can fall though. https://reviews.llvm.org/D28018 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
