tru wrote: > Though having said all this, I marked this for LLVM 19 as my reading of > https://discourse.llvm.org/t/update-on-llvm-19-x-releases/80511 was that new > features are still ok before RC2, but re-reading it it's a bit ambiguous: it > says "New features will have to wait until LLVM 20 at this point" and my > reading of that was that "this point" means RC2, so new features before RC2 > is fine, but if "this point" meant "right now" that means new features aren't > OK. If that's the case the it's reasonable for this to not go in RC2.
I am fine with it going into RC2 if it's part of a on-going work as you explained and that it doesn't create any big issues. Unfortunately with nico's latest comment it seems like this is breaking some build configurations and I am cutting RC2 now, I don't feel comfortable to merge it before that has been investigated. I can probably be convinced to take it in RC3 if it's really helpful to do so and it have been working without any problems. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99335 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
