================
@@ -4006,6 +4007,37 @@ class TreeTransform {
NumExpansions);
}
+ void RebuildLambdaExprImpl(SourceLocation StartLoc, SourceLocation EndLoc,
+ LambdaScopeInfo *LSI) {}
+
+ ExprResult RebuildLambdaExpr(SourceLocation StartLoc, SourceLocation EndLoc,
+ LambdaScopeInfo *LSI) {
+ CXXRecordDecl *Class = LSI->Lambda;
+ CXXMethodDecl *CallOperator = LSI->CallOperator;
+ CallOperator->setLexicalDeclContext(Class);
+ Decl *TemplateOrNonTemplateCallOperatorDecl =
+ CallOperator->getDescribedFunctionTemplate()
+ ? CallOperator->getDescribedFunctionTemplate()
+ : cast<Decl>(CallOperator);
+ // FIXME: Is this really the best choice? Keeping the lexical decl context
+ // set as CurContext seems more faithful to the source.
+ TemplateOrNonTemplateCallOperatorDecl->setLexicalDeclContext(Class);
+
+ getDerived().RebuildLambdaExprImpl(StartLoc, EndLoc, LSI);
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
@cor3ntin Aha, I've figured out a way to simplify this `RebuildLambdaExpr()`
thing: I think it's unnecessary to change the new method decl's lexical context
to CurContext (we do so in parsing because we want to align the Scope nesting
with the lexical nesting; however this is just what needs to be respected in
parsing) and this way, we could just get rid of these setter calls.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86265
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
