================
@@ -1779,6 +1779,42 @@ void Parser::checkPotentialAngleBracket(ExprResult
&PotentialTemplateName) {
Priority);
}
+bool Parser::isMissingTemplateKeywordBeforeScope(bool AnnotateInvalid) {
+ assert(Tok.is(tok::coloncolon));
+ Sema::DisableTypoCorrectionRAII DTC(Actions);
+ ColonProtectionRAIIObject ColonProtection(*this);
+
+ SourceLocation StartLoc = Tok.getLocation();
+ if (TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken())
+ return true;
+ if (Tok.isSimpleTypeSpecifier(getLangOpts()))
+ return false;
+ CXXScopeSpec SS;
+ ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier(SS, /*ObjectType=*/nullptr,
+ /*ObjectHasErrors=*/false,
+ /*EnteringContext=*/false);
+ ExprResult Result = tryParseCXXIdExpression(SS,
/*isAddressOfOperand=*/false);
----------------
zygoloid wrote:
Parsing the same expression twice could also be problematic in some cases --
for example, if it contains a lambda, we might assign it the wrong mangling
number. Can we arrange things such that for a valid program, we only parse the
expression once?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100425
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
