MaskRay wrote: Building abseil-cpp with the new Clang runs into errors. Are they expected?
```sh git clone https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/ cd abseil-cpp cmake -GNinja -S. -Bout/release -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/tmp/Rel/bin/clang++ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=/tmp/Rel/bin/clang ninja -C out/release ``` ``` In file included from /tmp/p/abseil-cpp/absl/flags/parse.cc:16: In file included from /tmp/p/abseil-cpp/absl/flags/parse.h:26: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/../../../../include/c++/14/string:67: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/../../../../include/c++/14/bits/memory_resource.h:47: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/../../../../include/c++/14/tuple:2590:14: error: call to constructor of 'tuple<basic_string_view<char, char_traits<char>> &, basic_string_view<char, char_traits<char>> &, bool &>' is ambiguous 2590 | { return tuple<_Elements&...>(__args...); } | ^ ~~~~~~ /tmp/p/abseil-cpp/absl/flags/parse.cc:820:10: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::tie<std::basic_string_view<char>, std::basic_string_view<char>, bool>' requested here 820 | std::tie(flag_name, value, is_empty_value) = | ^ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/../../../../include/c++/14/tuple:1334:2: note: candidate constructor [with _NotEmpty = true, $1 = true] 1334 | tuple(const _Elements&... __elements) | ^ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/../../../../include/c++/14/tuple:1349:2: note: candidate constructor [with _UElements = <std::basic_string_view<char> &, std::basic_string_view<char> &, bool &>, _Valid = true, $2 = true] 1349 | tuple(_UElements&&... __elements) | ^ ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100692 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
