sdkrystian wrote: > I am still concerned about the double error on the `t.A<1 < 4>::x` example. The ideal outcome would be to turn the second error into a note. How feasible to fix you think that is?
That's trivial to fix, just need to add a note variant of the "missing template" diagnostic. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100425 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
