================
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ The check doesn't do a bad job, but it's not perfect. In 
particular:
 
 - At the point that the check runs, the AST contains a single
   ``StringLiteral`` for the format string where escapes have been expanded.
-  The check tries to put the escapes back, they may not be exactly as they
-  were written (e.g. ``"\x41\x0a"`` will become ``"A\n"`` and ``"ab" "cd"``
-  will become ``"abcd"``.)
+  The check tries to reconstruct escapes sequences, they may not be the
----------------
5chmidti wrote:

`escapes` -> `escape`

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97911
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to