ilya-biryukov wrote: > But I'll still ask the question: would it make sense to name this > `-helpful-reproducers` or something more generic so we don't feel tempted to > expose even more internal options this way?
This is tricky as some issues reproduce only when we skip function bodies and sometimes when we don't. Sometimes we need a PCM that skips function bodies and another file consuming it that does not (this is a normal operation mode of Clangd). So even this particular flag does not bundle well with any other as we might need to set it independently of everything else. +1 to Fangrui's suggestion to mention this is a `-cc1` flag in the subject line when committing this. Otherwise, LGTM. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100135 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
