================
@@ -492,6 +493,18 @@ void Flang::addOffloadOptions(Compilation &C, const
InputInfoList &Inputs,
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_nogpulib))
CmdArgs.push_back("-nogpulib");
}
+
+ // For all the host OpenMP offloading compile jobs we need to pass the
targets
+ // information using -fopenmp-targets= option.
+ if (JA.isHostOffloading(Action::OFK_OpenMP)) {
+ SmallString<128> Targets("-fopenmp-targets=");
----------------
skatrak wrote:
This block of code is copied from clang:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/59e1c6cd63eb9287df6516f9a5ae564075e9c218/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp#L7746
Would it be better to leave it unchanged, let both implementations diverge or
apply these suggestions to clang too? I think it makes sense to do them, just
trying to avoid divergence on duplicated code.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100152
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
