================
@@ -353,7 +353,11 @@ Sema::DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPacks(SourceLocation Loc,
}
if (!EnclosingStmtExpr) {
- LSI->ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack = true;
+ // It is ok to have unexpanded packs in captures, template parameters
+ // and parameters too, but only the body statement does not store this
+ // flag, so we have to propagate it through LamdaScopeInfo.
+ if (LSI->AfterParameterList)
+ LSI->BodyContainsUnexpandedParameterPack = true;
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
Wait I thought it is my approach that goes through the lambda body twice in a
transformation. I didn't see additional calls to
`DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPacks` in this patch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99882
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
