rnk added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h:3570
for (auto *A : llvm::make_range(Arg, ArgRange.end()))
- ArgTypes.push_back(getVarArgType(A));
+ ArgTypes.push_back(getVarArgType(A, CallArgTypeInfo == nullptr));
----------------
rnk wrote:
> rnk wrote:
> > I'm testing this change:
> > ```
> > $ git diff
> > diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h
> > index acf8863..2662ebb 100644
> > --- a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h
> > +++ b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h
> > @@ -3571,7 +3571,8 @@ public:
> >
> > // If we still have any arguments, emit them using the type of the
> > argument.
> > for (auto *A : llvm::make_range(Arg, ArgRange.end()))
> > - ArgTypes.push_back(getVarArgType(A));
> > + ArgTypes.push_back(CalleeDecl->isVariadic() ? getVarArgType(A)
> > + : A->getType());
> >
> > EmitCallArgs(Args, ArgTypes, ArgRange, CalleeDecl, ParamsToSkip,
> > Order);
> > }
> >
> > ```
> >
> > I'd like to fix this issue in a separate commit.
> So, that didn't work at all, but the gist of it is that I don't think we
> should call a function like `getVarArgType` when we aren't lowering a
> variadic function call. I'll look into doing it.
rL290906 should fix it.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28166
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
