AaronBallman wrote: > After some initial experiments, it looks unlikely that a quick fix is > possible on our side. May I suggest a revert with a (say) 30-day expiration > date? That should give us enough time to come up with a fix on our side > (which will actually be a drop-other-work-and-fix-it approach this time).
Thank you for the investigations -- thirty days seems extremely reasonable to me. If you run into issues while fixing it on your end and need more than thirty days, that's also fine (we can figure out how much longer to wait at that point). I'll get the revert done shortly. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98497 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
