alanzhao1 wrote: > @alanzhao1 do you think it's reasonable for the workaround to only apply to > code in system headers, or does the NDK get included as regular headers > generally?
Having it only apply to system headers should be OK - in our case, chrome imports these headers as part of a `--sysroot`, which IIRC treats warnings the same way as `-isystem` > Do you need us to revert the changes while we resolve this? If you can revert while working on a solution, that would be helpful. > > @budimirarandjelovicsyrmia, can you please add a workaround so that the NDK > > code can continue to compile? > > I will investigate this. FYI I noticed that gcc can compile this with `-fpermissive` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70307 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
