memory-thrasher wrote: > I think this NTTP mangling code needs some significant updates, refactoring, > and an increase in test coverage. I see > [cd93532](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cd93532dfc455255cb2fa553090d14aaa52b106b) > landed last May, probably when I was offline for a while.
Oh for sure. There are 5 other cases in template argument values alone that are still broken, I just made their error messages slightly clearer, at least as to which case is happening. I fixed one specific case I was hitting for my own sake, and am trying to share it but I have little interest in trying to fix the others (for free). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97792 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
