kimgr added a comment.

Minor spelling nits inline



================
Comment at: clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/NoMallocCheck.cpp:30
+      callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasAnyName("::malloc", "::calloc"))))
+          .bind("aquisition"),
+      this);
----------------
Spelling nit: acquisition

But I wonder if there's a simpler word you can use for this, e.g. "alloc"


================
Comment at: clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/NoMallocCheck.cpp:47
+
+  if ((Call = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("aquisition")))
+    Recommendation = "consider a container or a smart pointer";
----------------
"aquisition" as above


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D26167



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D26167: [Clang-tid... Malcolm Parsons via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D26167: [Clan... Kim Gräsman via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to