================
@@ -816,6 +816,11 @@ class FPOptions {
setAllowFPReassociate(LO.AllowFPReassoc);
setNoHonorNaNs(LO.NoHonorNaNs);
setNoHonorInfs(LO.NoHonorInfs);
+ // Ensure that if FiniteMathOnly is enabled, NoHonorNaNs and NoHonorInfs
are
+ // also enabled. This is because FiniteMathOnly mode assumes no NaNs or
Infs
+ // are present in computations.
+ if (!LO.NoHonorInfs || !LO.NoHonorInfs)
+ assert(!LO.FiniteMathOnly && "FiniteMathOnly implies NoHonorInfs");
----------------
andykaylor wrote:
I agree with Aaron that we should get rid of the internal state that combines
these two modes. I expect we'll only want to define `__FINITE_MATH_ONLY__` when
we aren't honoring either. You could create code that made incorrect
assumptions either way, but the state described by the symbol is that we aren't
honoring either.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97342
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
