asl wrote:

> Is there any thought on how we want to manage signing schemas going forward? 
> For example I can imagine looking an environment from the triple to select a 
> signing schema for a particular platform. I could also see a potential for a 
> separate command line option to choose from documented named signing schemas.

I think we discussed this a bit and the conclusion was that it would be up to 
the platform to chose the appropriate signing scheme (and do ABI versioning if 
desired / necessary). However, currently there is no way to ask platform for 
this and it looks like a chicken-and-egg problem. So we may want to come with 
some "default" values that are more or less "good enough". These in the future 
might be fully overriden by a platform or we may chose alternative approach. 
For now it is just a way to combine different `-fpauth-*` options as it seems 
to me.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to