================ @@ -104,6 +107,7 @@ typedef _Atomic(long) atomic_long; typedef _Atomic(unsigned long) atomic_ulong; typedef _Atomic(long long) atomic_llong; typedef _Atomic(unsigned long long) atomic_ullong; +typedef _Atomic(unsigned char) atomic_char8_t; typedef _Atomic(uint_least16_t) atomic_char16_t; typedef _Atomic(uint_least32_t) atomic_char32_t; ---------------- AaronBallman wrote:
Let's address that one in a separate PR, but yes `atomic_char8_t` should be gated behind C23 because the identifier isn't reserved until C23. For C++, it should be gated behind C++20. As for the definition, technically in C they should be using `char8_t` and friends as well, but those are defined in `uchar.h` which we don't vend with the compiler (should we be vending that one in freestanding?). GCC seems to use `unsigned char` directly rather than use a transitive include, so I think that approach is fine for us to take as well. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97208 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
