https://github.com/mahesh-attarde updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
>From 6d6619f8f7a37906ac45791487a4d63b51a48ad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:15:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] added regcall strct by reg support
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp | 20 ++++++++++++
clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
b/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
index 43dadf5e724ac..506d106ad65b0 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ class X86_32ABIInfo : public ABIInfo {
Class classify(QualType Ty) const;
ABIArgInfo classifyReturnType(QualType RetTy, CCState &State) const;
+
ABIArgInfo classifyArgumentType(QualType RetTy, CCState &State,
unsigned ArgIndex) const;
@@ -1306,6 +1307,8 @@ class X86_64ABIInfo : public ABIInfo {
unsigned &NeededSSE,
unsigned &MaxVectorWidth) const;
+ bool DoesRegcallStructFitInReg(QualType Ty) const;
+
bool IsIllegalVectorType(QualType Ty) const;
/// The 0.98 ABI revision clarified a lot of ambiguities,
@@ -2830,6 +2833,20 @@ X86_64ABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty,
unsigned freeIntRegs,
return ABIArgInfo::getDirect(ResType);
}
+bool X86_64ABIInfo::DoesRegcallStructFitInReg(QualType Ty) const {
+ auto RT = Ty->castAs<RecordType>();
+ // For Integer class, Max GPR Size is 64
+ if (getContext().getTypeSize(Ty) > 64)
+ return false;
+ // Struct At hand must not have other non Builtin types
+ for (const auto *FD : RT->getDecl()->fields()) {
+ QualType MTy = FD->getType();
+ if (!MTy->isBuiltinType())
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
ABIArgInfo
X86_64ABIInfo::classifyRegCallStructTypeImpl(QualType Ty, unsigned &NeededInt,
unsigned &NeededSSE,
@@ -2837,6 +2854,9 @@ X86_64ABIInfo::classifyRegCallStructTypeImpl(QualType Ty,
unsigned &NeededInt,
auto RT = Ty->getAs<RecordType>();
assert(RT && "classifyRegCallStructType only valid with struct types");
+ if (DoesRegcallStructFitInReg(Ty))
+ return classifyArgumentType(Ty, UINT_MAX, NeededInt, NeededSSE, true,
true);
+
if (RT->getDecl()->hasFlexibleArrayMember())
return getIndirectReturnResult(Ty);
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..1c83407220861
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S %s -o - -ffreestanding -triple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
| FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=LINUX64
+
+#include <xmmintrin.h>
+struct struct1 { int x; int y; };
+void __regcall v6(int a, float b, struct struct1 c) {}
+
+void v6_caller(){
+ struct struct1 c0;
+ c0.x = 0xa0a0; c0.y = 0xb0b0;
+ int x= 0xf0f0, y = 0x0f0f;
+ v6(x,y,c0);
+}
+
+// LINUX64-LABEL: __regcall3__v6
+// LINUX64: movq %rcx, -8(%rsp)
+// LINUX64: movl %eax, -12(%rsp)
+// LINUX64: movss %xmm0, -16(%rsp)
+
+// LINUX64-LABEL: v6_caller
+// LINUX64: movl $41120, 16(%rsp) # imm = 0xA0A0
+// LINUX64: movl $45232, 20(%rsp) # imm = 0xB0B0
+// LINUX64: movl $61680, 12(%rsp) # imm = 0xF0F0
+// LINUX64: movl $3855, 8(%rsp) # imm = 0xF0F
+// LINUX64: movl 12(%rsp), %eax
+// LINUX64: cvtsi2ssl 8(%rsp), %xmm0
+// LINUX64: movq 16(%rsp), %rcx
+// LINUX64: callq .L__regcall3__v6$local
+
+
+struct struct2 { int x; float y; };
+void __regcall v31(int a, float b, struct struct2 c) {}
+
+void v31_caller(){
+ struct struct2 c0;
+ c0.x = 0xa0a0; c0.y = 0xb0b0;
+ int x= 0xf0f0, y = 0x0f0f;
+ v31(x,y,c0);
+}
+
+// LINUX64: __regcall3__v31: # @__regcall3__v31
+// LINUX64: movq %rcx, -8(%rsp)
+// LINUX64: movl %eax, -12(%rsp)
+// LINUX64: movss %xmm0, -16(%rsp)
+// LINUX64: v31_caller: # @v31_caller
+// LINUX64: movl $41120, 16(%rsp) # imm = 0xA0A0
+// LINUX64: movss .LCPI3_0(%rip), %xmm0 # xmm0 =
[4.5232E+4,0.0E+0,0.0E+0,0.0E+0]
+// LINUX64: movss %xmm0, 20(%rsp)
+// LINUX64: movl $61680, 12(%rsp) # imm = 0xF0F0
+// LINUX64: movl $3855, 8(%rsp) # imm = 0xF0F
+// LINUX64: movl 12(%rsp), %eax
+// LINUX64: cvtsi2ssl 8(%rsp), %xmm0
+// LINUX64: movq 16(%rsp), %rcx
+// LINUX64: callq .L__regcall3__v31$local
>From 8bdd245edd8dca9477d6541401737f2aeaf6e820 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:33:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] selectively call security cookie check
---
llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt | 1 +
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h | 4 +
.../lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp | 249 ++++++++++++++++++
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp | 1 +
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/opt-pipeline.ll | 1 +
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll | 22 +-
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll | 27 +-
7 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
index 44a54c8ec62cb..5303758ff8a2e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ set(sources
X86AvoidStoreForwardingBlocks.cpp
X86DynAllocaExpander.cpp
X86FixupSetCC.cpp
+ X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp
X86FloatingPoint.cpp
X86FrameLowering.cpp
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
index fdb9e4cad5e89..b4432f45987cd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ FunctionPass *createX86OptimizeLEAs();
/// Return a pass that transforms setcc + movzx pairs into xor + setcc.
FunctionPass *createX86FixupSetCC();
+/// Return a pass that transform inline stack protector into seperate bb
+FunctionPass *createX86FixupStackProtectorPass();
+
/// Return a pass that avoids creating store forward block issues in the
hardware.
FunctionPass *createX86AvoidStoreForwardingBlocks();
@@ -186,6 +189,7 @@ void initializeX86ExpandPseudoPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86FastPreTileConfigPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86FastTileConfigPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86FixupSetCCPassPass(PassRegistry &);
+void initializeX86FixupStackProtectorPassPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86FlagsCopyLoweringPassPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86LoadValueInjectionLoadHardeningPassPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86LoadValueInjectionRetHardeningPassPass(PassRegistry &);
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..f1355c62cc2c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+//===---- X86FixupStackProtector.cpp Fix Stack Protector Call ----------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// Stack Protector implementation inserts platform specific callback into code.
+// For windows __security_check_cookie call gets call everytime function is
+// return without fixup. Since this function is defined in runtime library, it
+// incures cost of call in dll which simply does comparison and returns most
+// time. With Fixup, We selective move to call in DLL only if comparison fails.
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "X86.h"
+#include "X86FrameLowering.h"
+#include "X86InstrInfo.h"
+#include "X86Subtarget.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/LivePhysRegs.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
+#include <iterator>
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "x86-fixup-spcall"
+
+namespace {
+
+class X86FixupStackProtectorPass : public MachineFunctionPass {
+public:
+ static char ID;
+
+ X86FixupStackProtectorPass() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {}
+
+ StringRef getPassName() const override { return "X86 Fixup Stack Protector";
}
+
+ bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
+
+ std::pair<MachineBasicBlock *, MachineInstr *>
+ getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(MachineFunction &MF);
+
+ void getGuardCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineInstr
*CheckCall,
+ MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]);
+
+ void SplitBasicBlock(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB,
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitIt);
+
+ void FinishBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB);
+
+ void FinishFunction(MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB, MachineBasicBlock
*NewRetMBB);
+
+ std::pair<MachineInstr *, MachineInstr *>
+ CreateFailCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock
*FailMBB,
+ MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]);
+};
+} // end anonymous namespace
+
+char X86FixupStackProtectorPass::ID = 0;
+
+INITIALIZE_PASS(X86FixupStackProtectorPass, DEBUG_TYPE, DEBUG_TYPE, false,
+ false)
+
+FunctionPass *llvm::createX86FixupStackProtectorPass() {
+ return new X86FixupStackProtectorPass();
+}
+
+void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::SplitBasicBlock(
+ MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB,
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitIt) {
+ NewRetMBB->splice(NewRetMBB->end(), CurMBB, SplitIt, CurMBB->end());
+}
+
+std::pair<MachineBasicBlock *, MachineInstr *>
+X86FixupStackProtectorPass::getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(MachineFunction &MF) {
+ MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator RBegin, REnd;
+
+ for (auto &MBB : llvm::reverse(MF)) {
+ for (RBegin = MBB.rbegin(), REnd = MBB.rend(); RBegin != REnd; RBegin++) {
+ auto &MI = *RBegin;
+ if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::CALL64pcrel32 &&
+ MI.getNumExplicitOperands() == 1) {
+ auto MO = MI.getOperand(0);
+ if (MO.isGlobal()) {
+ auto Callee = dyn_cast<Function>(MO.getGlobal());
+ if (Callee && Callee->getName() == "__security_check_cookie") {
+ return std::make_pair(&MBB, &MI);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return std::make_pair(nullptr, nullptr);
+}
+
+void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::getGuardCheckSequence(
+ MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineInstr *CheckCall,
+ MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]) {
+
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator UIt(CheckCall);
+ MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator DIt(CheckCall);
+ // Seq From StackUp to Stack Down Is fixed.
+ // ADJCALLSTACKUP64
+ UIt++;
+ SeqMI[4] = &*UIt;
+
+ // CALL __security_check_cookie
+ SeqMI[3] = CheckCall;
+
+ // COPY function slot cookie
+ DIt++;
+ SeqMI[2] = &*DIt;
+
+ // ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64
+ DIt++;
+ SeqMI[1] = &*DIt;
+
+ MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator XIt(SeqMI[1]);
+ for (; XIt != CurMBB->rbegin(); XIt++) {
+ auto &CI = *XIt;
+ if ((CI.getOpcode() == X86::XOR64_FP) || (CI.getOpcode() == X86::XOR32_FP))
+ break;
+ }
+ SeqMI[0] = &*XIt;
+}
+
+std::pair<MachineInstr *, MachineInstr *>
+X86FixupStackProtectorPass::CreateFailCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB,
+ MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB,
+ MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]) {
+
+ auto MF = CurMBB->getParent();
+
+ Module &M = *MF->getFunction().getParent();
+ GlobalVariable *GV = M.getGlobalVariable("__security_cookie");
+ assert(GV && " Security Cookie was not installed!");
+
+ MachineRegisterInfo &MRI = MF->getRegInfo();
+ const TargetInstrInfo *TII = MF->getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
+
+ MachineInstr *GuardXor = SeqMI[0];
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt(GuardXor);
+ InsertPt++;
+ unsigned DestReg = MRI.createVirtualRegister(&X86::GR64RegClass);
+ // MOV security_cookie value into register
+ auto CMI =
+ BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::MOV64rm), DestReg)
+ .addReg(X86::RIP)
+ .addImm(1)
+ .addReg(X86::NoRegister)
+ .addGlobalAddress(GV)
+ .addReg(X86::NoRegister);
+
+ // Compare security_Cookie with XOR_Val, if not same, we have violation
+ BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::CMP64rr))
+ .addReg(DestReg)
+ .addReg(GuardXor->getOperand(0).getReg());
+
+ BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::JCC_1))
+ .addMBB(FailMBB)
+ .addImm(X86::COND_NE);
+
+ auto JMI = BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::JMP_1));
+
+ return std::make_pair(CMI.getInstr(), JMI.getInstr());
+}
+
+void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::FinishBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
+ LivePhysRegs LiveRegs;
+ computeAndAddLiveIns(LiveRegs, *MBB);
+}
+
+void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::FinishFunction(MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB,
+ MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB) {
+ FailMBB->getParent()->RenumberBlocks();
+ // FailMBB includes call to MSCV RT where is __security_check_cookie
+ // function is called. This function uses regcall and it expects cookie
+ // value from stack slot.( even if this is modified)
+ // Before going further we compute back livein for this block to make sure
+ // it is live and provided.
+ FinishBlock(FailMBB);
+ FinishBlock(NewRetMBB);
+}
+
+bool X86FixupStackProtectorPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
+ bool Changed = false;
+ const X86Subtarget &STI = MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
+
+ if (!(STI.isTargetWindowsItanium() || STI.isTargetWindowsMSVC()))
+ return Changed;
+
+ // Check if security cookie was installed or not
+ Module &M = *MF.getFunction().getParent();
+ GlobalVariable *GV = M.getGlobalVariable("__security_cookie");
+ if (!GV)
+ return Changed;
+
+ const TargetInstrInfo *TII = MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
+
+ // Check if security check cookie was installed or not
+ auto [CurMBB, CheckCall] = getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(MF);
+
+ if (!CheckCall)
+ return Changed;
+
+ MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB = MF.CreateMachineBasicBlock();
+ MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB = MF.CreateMachineBasicBlock();
+
+ MF.insert(MF.end(), NewRetMBB);
+ MF.insert(MF.end(), FailMBB);
+
+ MachineInstr *SeqMI[5];
+ getGuardCheckSequence(CurMBB, CheckCall, SeqMI);
+ // MachineInstr * GuardXor = SeqMI[0];
+
+ auto FailSeqRange = CreateFailCheckSequence(CurMBB, FailMBB, SeqMI);
+ MachineInstrBuilder JMI(MF, FailSeqRange.second);
+
+ // After Inserting JMP_1, we can not have two terminators
+ // in same block, split CurrentMBB after JMP_1
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitIt(SeqMI[4]);
+ SplitIt++;
+ SplitBasicBlock(CurMBB, NewRetMBB, SplitIt);
+
+ // Fill up Failure Routine, move Fail Check Squence from CurMBB to FailMBB
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator U1It(SeqMI[1]);
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator U2It(SeqMI[4]);
+ U2It++;
+ FailMBB->splice(FailMBB->end(), CurMBB, U1It, U2It);
+ BuildMI(*FailMBB, FailMBB->end(), DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::INT3));
+
+ // Move left over instruction after StackUp
+ // from Current Basic BLocks into New Return Block
+ JMI.addMBB(NewRetMBB);
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplicePt(JMI.getInstr());
+ SplicePt++;
+ if (SplicePt != CurMBB->end())
+ NewRetMBB->splice(NewRetMBB->end(), CurMBB, SplicePt);
+
+ // Restructure Basic Blocks
+ CurMBB->addSuccessor(NewRetMBB);
+ CurMBB->addSuccessor(FailMBB);
+
+ FinishFunction(FailMBB, NewRetMBB);
+ return !Changed;
+}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
index d4e642c7df9cf..b245e80ad18dc 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
@@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ bool X86PassConfig::addPreISel() {
void X86PassConfig::addPreRegAlloc() {
if (getOptLevel() != CodeGenOptLevel::None) {
addPass(&LiveRangeShrinkID);
+ addPass(createX86FixupStackProtectorPass());
addPass(createX86FixupSetCC());
addPass(createX86OptimizeLEAs());
addPass(createX86CallFrameOptimization());
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/opt-pipeline.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/opt-pipeline.ll
index 15c496bfb7f66..631f955ee6cc0 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/opt-pipeline.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/opt-pipeline.ll
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@
; CHECK-NEXT: Peephole Optimizations
; CHECK-NEXT: Remove dead machine instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: Live Range Shrink
+; CHECK-NEXT: X86 Fixup Stack Protector
; CHECK-NEXT: X86 Fixup SetCC
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Machine Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: X86 LEA Optimize
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
index d0b6585f40ffe..f8eb47663fb18 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
@@ -38,8 +38,13 @@ return: ; preds = %entry
; MSVC-X64: callq strcpy
; MSVC-X64: movq [[SLOT]](%rsp), %rcx
; MSVC-X64: xorq %rsp, %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64: cmpq %rcx, %rax
+; MSVC-X64: jne .LBB0_2
; MSVC-X64: retq
+; MSVC-X64: LBB0_2:
+; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64: int3
; MSVC-X86-O0-LABEL: _test:
; MSVC-X86-O0: movl ___security_cookie, %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
@@ -97,9 +102,13 @@ define void @test_vla(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
; MSVC-X64: callq escape
; MSVC-X64: movq [[SLOT]](%rbp), %rcx
; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64: cmpq %rcx, %rax
+; MSVC-X64: jne .LBB1_2
; MSVC-X64: retq
-
+; MSVC-X64: LBB1_2
+; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64: int3
; This case is interesting because we address local variables with RBX but XOR
; the guard value with RBP. That's fine, either value will do, as long as they
@@ -148,11 +157,14 @@ define void @test_vla_realign(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
; MSVC-X64: callq escape
; MSVC-X64: movq [[SLOT]](%rbx), %rcx
; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64: cmpq %rcx, %rax
+; MSVC-X64: jne .LBB2_2
+; MSVC-X64: retq
; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
-; MSVC-X64: retq
+; MSVC-X64: int3
declare ptr @strcpy(ptr, ptr) nounwind
declare i32 @printf(ptr, ...) nounwind
-
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
index bb9b4429c0761..ad9f4b9d6a4b6 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
@@ -5,9 +5,20 @@ declare void @h(ptr, i64, ptr)
define tailcc void @tailcall_frame(ptr %0, i64 %1) sspreq {
; WINDOWS-LABEL: tailcall_frame:
-; WINDOWS: callq __security_check_cookie
+; WINDOWS: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; WINDOWS: xorq %rsp, %rax
+; WINDOWS: movq %rax, {{[0-9]*}}(%rsp)
+; WINDOWS: movq {{[0-9]*}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; WINDOWS: xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; WINDOWS: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; WINDOWS: cmpq %rcx, %rax
+; WINDOWS: jne .LBB0_1
; WINDOWS: xorl %ecx, %ecx
; WINDOWS: jmp h
+; WINDOWS: .LBB0_1
+; WINDOWS: callq __security_check_cookie
+; WINDOWS: int3
+
; LINUX-LABEL: tailcall_frame:
; LINUX: jne
@@ -22,10 +33,18 @@ declare void @bar()
define void @tailcall_unrelated_frame() sspreq {
; WINDOWS-LABEL: tailcall_unrelated_frame:
; WINDOWS: subq [[STACK:\$.*]], %rsp
+; WINDOWS: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; WINDOWS: xorq %rsp, %rax
; WINDOWS: callq bar
-; WINDOWS: callq __security_check_cookie
-; WINDOWS: addq [[STACK]], %rsp
-; WINDOWS: jmp bar
+; WINDOWS: movq {{[0-9]*}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; WINDOWS: xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; WINDOWS: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; WINDOWS: cmpq %rcx, %rax
+; WINDOWS: jne .LBB1_1
+; WINDOWS: jmp bar
+; WINDOWS: .LBB1_1
+; WINDOWS: callq __security_check_cookie
+; WINDOWS: int3
; LINUX-LABEL: tailcall_unrelated_frame:
; LINUX: callq bar
>From 116978cb3ae8e69077da121f5b85464de5435ad7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:03:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] Revert "added regcall strct by reg support"
This reverts commit 6d6619f8f7a37906ac45791487a4d63b51a48ad1.
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp | 20 ------------
clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c | 53 -------------------------------
2 files changed, 73 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
b/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
index 506d106ad65b0..43dadf5e724ac 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ class X86_32ABIInfo : public ABIInfo {
Class classify(QualType Ty) const;
ABIArgInfo classifyReturnType(QualType RetTy, CCState &State) const;
-
ABIArgInfo classifyArgumentType(QualType RetTy, CCState &State,
unsigned ArgIndex) const;
@@ -1307,8 +1306,6 @@ class X86_64ABIInfo : public ABIInfo {
unsigned &NeededSSE,
unsigned &MaxVectorWidth) const;
- bool DoesRegcallStructFitInReg(QualType Ty) const;
-
bool IsIllegalVectorType(QualType Ty) const;
/// The 0.98 ABI revision clarified a lot of ambiguities,
@@ -2833,20 +2830,6 @@ X86_64ABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty,
unsigned freeIntRegs,
return ABIArgInfo::getDirect(ResType);
}
-bool X86_64ABIInfo::DoesRegcallStructFitInReg(QualType Ty) const {
- auto RT = Ty->castAs<RecordType>();
- // For Integer class, Max GPR Size is 64
- if (getContext().getTypeSize(Ty) > 64)
- return false;
- // Struct At hand must not have other non Builtin types
- for (const auto *FD : RT->getDecl()->fields()) {
- QualType MTy = FD->getType();
- if (!MTy->isBuiltinType())
- return false;
- }
- return true;
-}
-
ABIArgInfo
X86_64ABIInfo::classifyRegCallStructTypeImpl(QualType Ty, unsigned &NeededInt,
unsigned &NeededSSE,
@@ -2854,9 +2837,6 @@ X86_64ABIInfo::classifyRegCallStructTypeImpl(QualType Ty,
unsigned &NeededInt,
auto RT = Ty->getAs<RecordType>();
assert(RT && "classifyRegCallStructType only valid with struct types");
- if (DoesRegcallStructFitInReg(Ty))
- return classifyArgumentType(Ty, UINT_MAX, NeededInt, NeededSSE, true,
true);
-
if (RT->getDecl()->hasFlexibleArrayMember())
return getIndirectReturnResult(Ty);
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 1c83407220861..0000000000000
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/regcall3.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S %s -o - -ffreestanding -triple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
| FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=LINUX64
-
-#include <xmmintrin.h>
-struct struct1 { int x; int y; };
-void __regcall v6(int a, float b, struct struct1 c) {}
-
-void v6_caller(){
- struct struct1 c0;
- c0.x = 0xa0a0; c0.y = 0xb0b0;
- int x= 0xf0f0, y = 0x0f0f;
- v6(x,y,c0);
-}
-
-// LINUX64-LABEL: __regcall3__v6
-// LINUX64: movq %rcx, -8(%rsp)
-// LINUX64: movl %eax, -12(%rsp)
-// LINUX64: movss %xmm0, -16(%rsp)
-
-// LINUX64-LABEL: v6_caller
-// LINUX64: movl $41120, 16(%rsp) # imm = 0xA0A0
-// LINUX64: movl $45232, 20(%rsp) # imm = 0xB0B0
-// LINUX64: movl $61680, 12(%rsp) # imm = 0xF0F0
-// LINUX64: movl $3855, 8(%rsp) # imm = 0xF0F
-// LINUX64: movl 12(%rsp), %eax
-// LINUX64: cvtsi2ssl 8(%rsp), %xmm0
-// LINUX64: movq 16(%rsp), %rcx
-// LINUX64: callq .L__regcall3__v6$local
-
-
-struct struct2 { int x; float y; };
-void __regcall v31(int a, float b, struct struct2 c) {}
-
-void v31_caller(){
- struct struct2 c0;
- c0.x = 0xa0a0; c0.y = 0xb0b0;
- int x= 0xf0f0, y = 0x0f0f;
- v31(x,y,c0);
-}
-
-// LINUX64: __regcall3__v31: # @__regcall3__v31
-// LINUX64: movq %rcx, -8(%rsp)
-// LINUX64: movl %eax, -12(%rsp)
-// LINUX64: movss %xmm0, -16(%rsp)
-// LINUX64: v31_caller: # @v31_caller
-// LINUX64: movl $41120, 16(%rsp) # imm = 0xA0A0
-// LINUX64: movss .LCPI3_0(%rip), %xmm0 # xmm0 =
[4.5232E+4,0.0E+0,0.0E+0,0.0E+0]
-// LINUX64: movss %xmm0, 20(%rsp)
-// LINUX64: movl $61680, 12(%rsp) # imm = 0xF0F0
-// LINUX64: movl $3855, 8(%rsp) # imm = 0xF0F
-// LINUX64: movl 12(%rsp), %eax
-// LINUX64: cvtsi2ssl 8(%rsp), %xmm0
-// LINUX64: movq 16(%rsp), %rcx
-// LINUX64: callq .L__regcall3__v31$local
>From fbb566b1633150d3e3702f4abc18b53599ccda88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:26:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] address review comments for mov
---
.../lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp | 20 +-
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll | 335 +++++++++++++++++-
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll | 114 ++++--
3 files changed, 420 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
index f1355c62cc2c1..d8c31e544d348 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
@@ -138,26 +138,20 @@
X86FixupStackProtectorPass::CreateFailCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB,
GlobalVariable *GV = M.getGlobalVariable("__security_cookie");
assert(GV && " Security Cookie was not installed!");
- MachineRegisterInfo &MRI = MF->getRegInfo();
const TargetInstrInfo *TII = MF->getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
MachineInstr *GuardXor = SeqMI[0];
MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt(GuardXor);
InsertPt++;
- unsigned DestReg = MRI.createVirtualRegister(&X86::GR64RegClass);
- // MOV security_cookie value into register
- auto CMI =
- BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::MOV64rm), DestReg)
- .addReg(X86::RIP)
- .addImm(1)
- .addReg(X86::NoRegister)
- .addGlobalAddress(GV)
- .addReg(X86::NoRegister);
// Compare security_Cookie with XOR_Val, if not same, we have violation
- BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::CMP64rr))
- .addReg(DestReg)
- .addReg(GuardXor->getOperand(0).getReg());
+ auto CMI = BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::CMP64rm))
+ .addReg(GuardXor->getOperand(0).getReg())
+ .addReg(X86::RIP)
+ .addImm(1)
+ .addReg(X86::NoRegister)
+ .addGlobalAddress(GV)
+ .addReg(X86::NoRegister);
BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::JCC_1))
.addMBB(FailMBB)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
index f8eb47663fb18..75f8b613b1b95 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
; RUN: llc -mtriple=i386-pc-windows-msvc < %s -o - | FileCheck
-check-prefix=MSVC-X86 %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc < %s -o - | FileCheck
-check-prefix=MSVC-X64 %s
@@ -8,6 +9,100 @@
@"\01LC" = internal constant [11 x i8] c"buf == %s\0A\00" ; <ptr> [#uses=1]
define void @test(ptr %a) nounwind ssp {
+; MSVC-X86-LABEL: test:
+; MSVC-X86: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: subl $12, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %eax, {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _strcpy
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $8, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl $LC
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _printf
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $8, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %esp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $12, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test:
+; MSVC-X64: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $64, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rcx, %rdx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rax, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rcx, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsi, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq strcpy
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq LC(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsi, %rdx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq printf
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: jne .LBB0_2
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: # %bb.1:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $64, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: retq
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: .LBB0_2:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: int3
+;
+; MSVC-X86-O0-LABEL: test:
+; MSVC-X86-O0: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: subl $20, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, 4(%eax)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, (%eax)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _strcpy
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal LC, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, (%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _printf
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: # %bb.1: # %return
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %esp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: addl $20, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-O0-LABEL: test:
+; MSVC-X64-O0: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $56, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rax, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rcx, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rdx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq strcpy
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq LC(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rdx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq printf
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: # %bb.1: # %return
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: addq $56, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: retq
entry:
%a_addr = alloca ptr ; <ptr> [#uses=2]
%buf = alloca [8 x i8] ; <ptr> [#uses=2]
@@ -70,6 +165,107 @@ return: ; preds = %entry
declare void @escape(ptr)
define void @test_vla(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
+; MSVC-X86-LABEL: test_vla:
+; MSVC-X86: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl 8(%ebp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, -4(%ebp)
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: shll $2, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll __chkstk
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl -4(%ebp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %ebp, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test_vla:
+; MSVC-X64: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $16, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rax, -8(%rbp)
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq 15(,%rax,4), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: andq $-16, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __chkstk
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq %rax, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq -8(%rbp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: jne .LBB1_2
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: # %bb.1:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rbp, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: retq
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: .LBB1_2:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: int3
+;
+; MSVC-X86-O0-LABEL: test_vla:
+; MSVC-X86-O0: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: pushl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: pushl %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl 8(%ebp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, -4(%ebp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: shll $2, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll __chkstk
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: subl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, (%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl -4(%ebp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ebp, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: popl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-O0-LABEL: test_vla:
+; MSVC-X64-O0: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: pushq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $16, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rax, -8(%rbp)
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: # kill: def $rax killed $eax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq 15(,%rax,4), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: andq $-16, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __chkstk
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq %rax, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq -8(%rbp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rbp, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: popq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: retq
%vla = alloca i32, i32 %n
call void @escape(ptr %vla)
ret void
@@ -115,6 +311,143 @@ define void @test_vla(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
; are the same across the life of the frame.
define void @test_vla_realign(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
+; MSVC-X86-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
+; MSVC-X86: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %edi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: andl $-32, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: subl $32, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl 8(%ebp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, 12(%esi)
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: shll $2, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll __chkstk
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %edi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esi, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %edi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl 12(%esi), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: leal -8(%ebp), %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %edi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
+; MSVC-X64: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: andq $-32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rax, 24(%rbx)
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq 15(,%rax,4), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: andq $-16, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __chkstk
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq %rax, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rbx, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsi, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq 24(%rbx), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: jne .LBB2_2
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: # %bb.1:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rbp, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: retq
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: .LBB2_2:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: int3
+;
+; MSVC-X86-O0-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
+; MSVC-X86-O0: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: pushl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: andl $-32, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: subl $64, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %esi
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl 8(%ebp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, 48(%esi)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: shll $2, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll __chkstk
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, 28(%esi) # 4-byte Spill
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal 32(%esi), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: subl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, (%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl 28(%esi), %eax # 4-byte Reload
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, (%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl 48(%esi), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal -4(%ebp), %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: popl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: popl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-O0-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
+; MSVC-X64-O0: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: pushq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: pushq %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $72, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: andq $-32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rax, 64(%rbx)
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: # kill: def $rax killed $eax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq 15(,%rax,4), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: andq $-16, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __chkstk
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq %rax, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rax, 24(%rbx) # 8-byte Spill
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq 32(%rbx), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq 24(%rbx), %rcx # 8-byte Reload
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq 64(%rbx), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq 8(%rbp), %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: popq %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: popq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: retq
%realign = alloca i32, align 32
%vla = alloca i32, i32 %n
call void @escape(ptr %realign)
@@ -160,7 +493,7 @@ define void @test_vla_realign(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
; MSVC-X64: cmpq %rcx, %rax
; MSVC-X64: jne .LBB2_2
-; MSVC-X64: retq
+; MSVC-X64: retq
; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
; MSVC-X64: int3
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
index ad9f4b9d6a4b6..1328e0cfa7124 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-windows-msvc %s -o - -verify-machineinstrs |
FileCheck %s -check-prefix=WINDOWS
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu %s -o - -verify-machineinstrs |
FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LINUX
@@ -5,25 +6,49 @@ declare void @h(ptr, i64, ptr)
define tailcc void @tailcall_frame(ptr %0, i64 %1) sspreq {
; WINDOWS-LABEL: tailcall_frame:
-; WINDOWS: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
-; WINDOWS: xorq %rsp, %rax
-; WINDOWS: movq %rax, {{[0-9]*}}(%rsp)
-; WINDOWS: movq {{[0-9]*}}(%rsp), %rcx
-; WINDOWS: xorq %rsp, %rcx
-; WINDOWS: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
-; WINDOWS: cmpq %rcx, %rax
-; WINDOWS: jne .LBB0_1
-; WINDOWS: xorl %ecx, %ecx
-; WINDOWS: jmp h
-; WINDOWS: .LBB0_1
-; WINDOWS: callq __security_check_cookie
-; WINDOWS: int3
+; WINDOWS: # %bb.0:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: subq $56, %rsp
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: .seh_stackalloc 56
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: .seh_endprologue
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rax
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: movq %rax, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: jne .LBB0_1
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: # %bb.2:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: xorl %ecx, %ecx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: xorl %edx, %edx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: xorl %r8d, %r8d
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: addq $56, %rsp
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: jmp h # TAILCALL
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: .LBB0_1:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: int3
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: .seh_endproc
+;
+; LINUX-LABEL: tailcall_frame:
+; LINUX: # %bb.0:
+; LINUX-NEXT: subq $24, %rsp
+; LINUX-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
+; LINUX-NEXT: movq %fs:40, %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT: movq %rax, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; LINUX-NEXT: movq %fs:40, %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT: cmpq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT: jne .LBB0_2
+; LINUX-NEXT: # %bb.1: # %SP_return
+; LINUX-NEXT: xorl %edi, %edi
+; LINUX-NEXT: xorl %esi, %esi
+; LINUX-NEXT: xorl %edx, %edx
+; LINUX-NEXT: addq $24, %rsp
+; LINUX-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
+; LINUX-NEXT: jmp h@PLT # TAILCALL
+; LINUX-NEXT: .LBB0_2: # %CallStackCheckFailBlk
+; LINUX-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
+; LINUX-NEXT: callq __stack_chk_fail@PLT
-; LINUX-LABEL: tailcall_frame:
-; LINUX: jne
-; LINUX: jmp h
-; LINUX: callq __stack_chk_fail
tail call tailcc void @h(ptr null, i64 0, ptr null)
ret void
@@ -32,25 +57,44 @@ define tailcc void @tailcall_frame(ptr %0, i64 %1) sspreq {
declare void @bar()
define void @tailcall_unrelated_frame() sspreq {
; WINDOWS-LABEL: tailcall_unrelated_frame:
-; WINDOWS: subq [[STACK:\$.*]], %rsp
-; WINDOWS: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
-; WINDOWS: xorq %rsp, %rax
-; WINDOWS: callq bar
-; WINDOWS: movq {{[0-9]*}}(%rsp), %rcx
-; WINDOWS: xorq %rsp, %rcx
-; WINDOWS: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
-; WINDOWS: cmpq %rcx, %rax
-; WINDOWS: jne .LBB1_1
-; WINDOWS: jmp bar
-; WINDOWS: .LBB1_1
-; WINDOWS: callq __security_check_cookie
-; WINDOWS: int3
-
+; WINDOWS: # %bb.0:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: subq $40, %rsp
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: .seh_stackalloc 40
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: .seh_endprologue
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rax
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: movq %rax, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: callq bar
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: jne .LBB1_1
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: # %bb.2:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: addq $40, %rsp
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: jmp bar # TAILCALL
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: .LBB1_1:
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: int3
+; WINDOWS-NEXT: .seh_endproc
+;
; LINUX-LABEL: tailcall_unrelated_frame:
-; LINUX: callq bar
-; LINUX: jne
-; LINUX: jmp bar
-; LINUX: callq __stack_chk_fail
+; LINUX: # %bb.0:
+; LINUX-NEXT: pushq %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+; LINUX-NEXT: movq %fs:40, %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT: movq %rax, (%rsp)
+; LINUX-NEXT: callq bar@PLT
+; LINUX-NEXT: movq %fs:40, %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT: cmpq (%rsp), %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT: jne .LBB1_2
+; LINUX-NEXT: # %bb.1: # %SP_return
+; LINUX-NEXT: popq %rax
+; LINUX-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
+; LINUX-NEXT: jmp bar@PLT # TAILCALL
+; LINUX-NEXT: .LBB1_2: # %CallStackCheckFailBlk
+; LINUX-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+; LINUX-NEXT: callq __stack_chk_fail@PLT
+
call void @bar()
tail call void @bar()
>From 2c942b15e14775eff186323c40d70242e237ea9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 03:45:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] fix overwrite by update_llc
---
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll | 122 ------------------
1 file changed, 122 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
index 75f8b613b1b95..a70a30bcd8c76 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
@@ -116,52 +116,6 @@ return: ; preds = %entry
ret void
}
-; MSVC-X86-LABEL: _test:
-; MSVC-X86: movl ___security_cookie, %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %esp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X86: movl %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%esp)
-; MSVC-X86: calll _strcpy
-; MSVC-X86: movl [[SLOT]](%esp), %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %esp, %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
-; MSVC-X86: retl
-
-; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test:
-; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rsp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X64: movq %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%rsp)
-; MSVC-X64: callq strcpy
-; MSVC-X64: movq [[SLOT]](%rsp), %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rsp, %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
-; MSVC-X64: cmpq %rcx, %rax
-; MSVC-X64: jne .LBB0_2
-; MSVC-X64: retq
-; MSVC-X64: LBB0_2:
-; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
-; MSVC-X64: int3
-
-; MSVC-X86-O0-LABEL: _test:
-; MSVC-X86-O0: movl ___security_cookie, %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X86-O0: xorl %esp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X86-O0: movl %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%esp)
-; MSVC-X86-O0: calll _strcpy
-; MSVC-X86-O0: movl [[SLOT]](%esp), %ecx
-; MSVC-X86-O0: xorl %esp, %ecx
-; MSVC-X86-O0: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
-; MSVC-X86-O0: retl
-
-; MSVC-X64-O0-LABEL: test:
-; MSVC-X64-O0: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X64-O0: xorq %rsp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X64-O0: movq %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%rsp)
-; MSVC-X64-O0: callq strcpy
-; MSVC-X64-O0: movq [[SLOT]](%rsp), %rcx
-; MSVC-X64-O0: xorq %rsp, %rcx
-; MSVC-X64-O0: callq __security_check_cookie
-; MSVC-X64-O0: retq
-
-
declare void @escape(ptr)
define void @test_vla(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
@@ -271,40 +225,6 @@ define void @test_vla(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
ret void
}
-; MSVC-X86-LABEL: _test_vla:
-; MSVC-X86: pushl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: movl %esp, %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: movl ___security_cookie, %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %ebp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X86: movl %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:-[0-9]*]](%ebp)
-; MSVC-X86: calll __chkstk
-; MSVC-X86: pushl
-; MSVC-X86: calll _escape
-; MSVC-X86: movl [[SLOT]](%ebp), %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %ebp, %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
-; MSVC-X86: movl %ebp, %esp
-; MSVC-X86: popl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: retl
-
-; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test_vla:
-; MSVC-X64: pushq %rbp
-; MSVC-X64: subq $16, %rsp
-; MSVC-X64: leaq 16(%rsp), %rbp
-; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X64: movq %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:-[0-9]*]](%rbp)
-; MSVC-X64: callq __chkstk
-; MSVC-X64: callq escape
-; MSVC-X64: movq [[SLOT]](%rbp), %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
-; MSVC-X64: cmpq %rcx, %rax
-; MSVC-X64: jne .LBB1_2
-; MSVC-X64: retq
-; MSVC-X64: LBB1_2
-; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
-; MSVC-X64: int3
; This case is interesting because we address local variables with RBX but XOR
; the guard value with RBP. That's fine, either value will do, as long as they
@@ -455,48 +375,6 @@ define void @test_vla_realign(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
ret void
}
-; MSVC-X86-LABEL: _test_vla_realign:
-; MSVC-X86: pushl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: movl %esp, %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: pushl %esi
-; MSVC-X86: andl $-32, %esp
-; MSVC-X86: subl $32, %esp
-; MSVC-X86: movl %esp, %esi
-; MSVC-X86: movl ___security_cookie, %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %ebp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X86: movl %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%esi)
-; MSVC-X86: calll __chkstk
-; MSVC-X86: pushl
-; MSVC-X86: calll _escape
-; MSVC-X86: movl [[SLOT]](%esi), %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %ebp, %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
-; MSVC-X86: leal -8(%ebp), %esp
-; MSVC-X86: popl %esi
-; MSVC-X86: popl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: retl
-
-; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
-; MSVC-X64: pushq %rbp
-; MSVC-X64: pushq %rbx
-; MSVC-X64: subq $32, %rsp
-; MSVC-X64: leaq 32(%rsp), %rbp
-; MSVC-X64: andq $-32, %rsp
-; MSVC-X64: movq %rsp, %rbx
-; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X64: movq %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%rbx)
-; MSVC-X64: callq __chkstk
-; MSVC-X64: callq escape
-; MSVC-X64: movq [[SLOT]](%rbx), %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
-; MSVC-X64: cmpq %rcx, %rax
-; MSVC-X64: jne .LBB2_2
-; MSVC-X64: retq
-; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
-; MSVC-X64: int3
-
declare ptr @strcpy(ptr, ptr) nounwind
>From 06fbe6a8089f0df04077f9a35d775a78f873b780 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:47:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] update testcase broken in merge
---
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll | 402 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 332 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
index f03fbeb9d1fe2..d718062d2c485 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-msvc.ll
@@ -9,6 +9,100 @@
@"\01LC" = internal constant [11 x i8] c"buf == %s\0A\00" ; <ptr> [#uses=1]
define void @test(ptr %a) nounwind ssp {
+; MSVC-X86-LABEL: test:
+; MSVC-X86: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: subl $12, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %eax, {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _strcpy
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $8, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl $LC
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _printf
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $8, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %esp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $12, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test:
+; MSVC-X64: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $64, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rcx, %rdx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rax, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rcx, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsi, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq strcpy
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq LC(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsi, %rdx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq printf
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: jne .LBB0_2
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: # %bb.1:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $64, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: retq
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: .LBB0_2:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: int3
+;
+; MSVC-X86-O0-LABEL: test:
+; MSVC-X86-O0: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: subl $20, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, 4(%eax)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, (%eax)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _strcpy
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal LC, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, (%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _printf
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: # %bb.1: # %return
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %esp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: addl $20, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-O0-LABEL: test:
+; MSVC-X64-O0: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $56, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rax, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rcx, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp)
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rdx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq strcpy
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq LC(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rdx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq printf
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: # %bb.1: # %return
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rsp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: addq $56, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: retq
entry:
%a_addr = alloca ptr ; <ptr> [#uses=2]
%buf = alloca [8 x i8] ; <ptr> [#uses=2]
@@ -25,47 +119,254 @@ return: ; preds = %entry
declare void @escape(ptr)
define void @test_vla(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
+; MSVC-X86-LABEL: test_vla:
+; MSVC-X86: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl 8(%ebp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, -4(%ebp)
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: shll $2, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll __chkstk
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl -4(%ebp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %ebp, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test_vla:
+; MSVC-X64: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $16, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rax, -8(%rbp)
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq 15(,%rax,4), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: andq $-16, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __chkstk
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq %rax, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq -8(%rbp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: jne .LBB1_2
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: # %bb.1:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rbp, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: retq
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: .LBB1_2:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: int3
+;
+; MSVC-X86-O0-LABEL: test_vla:
+; MSVC-X86-O0: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: pushl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: pushl %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl 8(%ebp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, -4(%ebp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: shll $2, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll __chkstk
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: subl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, (%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl -4(%ebp), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ebp, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: popl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-O0-LABEL: test_vla:
+; MSVC-X64-O0: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: pushq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $16, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rax, -8(%rbp)
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: # kill: def $rax killed $eax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq 15(,%rax,4), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: andq $-16, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __chkstk
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq %rax, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq -8(%rbp), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rbp, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: popq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: retq
%vla = alloca i32, i32 %n
call void @escape(ptr %vla)
ret void
}
-; MSVC-X86-LABEL: _test_vla:
-; MSVC-X86: pushl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: movl %esp, %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: movl ___security_cookie, %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %ebp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X86: movl %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:-[0-9]*]](%ebp)
-; MSVC-X86: calll __chkstk
-; MSVC-X86: pushl
-; MSVC-X86: calll _escape
-; MSVC-X86: movl [[SLOT]](%ebp), %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %ebp, %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
-; MSVC-X86: movl %ebp, %esp
-; MSVC-X86: popl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: retl
-
-; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test_vla:
-; MSVC-X64: pushq %rbp
-; MSVC-X64: subq $16, %rsp
-; MSVC-X64: leaq 16(%rsp), %rbp
-; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X64: movq %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:-[0-9]*]](%rbp)
-; MSVC-X64: callq __chkstk
-; MSVC-X64: callq escape
-; MSVC-X64: movq [[SLOT]](%rbp), %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
-; MSVC-X64: retq
-
-
; This case is interesting because we address local variables with RBX but XOR
; the guard value with RBP. That's fine, either value will do, as long as they
; are the same across the life of the frame.
define void @test_vla_realign(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
+; MSVC-X86-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
+; MSVC-X86: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %edi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: andl $-32, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: subl $32, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl 8(%ebp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, 12(%esi)
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: shll $2, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll __chkstk
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %edi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl %esi, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %eax
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: pushl %edi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: movl 12(%esi), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: leal -8(%ebp), %esp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %edi
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: popl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
+; MSVC-X64: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: pushq %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: andq $-32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rax, 24(%rbx)
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: leaq 15(,%rax,4), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: andq $-16, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __chkstk
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq %rax, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rbx, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rsi, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq 24(%rbx), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: cmpq __security_cookie(%rip), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: jne .LBB2_2
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: # %bb.1:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: movq %rbp, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rsi
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: popq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: retq
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: .LBB2_2:
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-NEXT: int3
+;
+; MSVC-X86-O0-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
+; MSVC-X86-O0: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: pushl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: andl $-32, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: subl $64, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %esi
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl 8(%ebp), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl ___security_cookie, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, 48(%esi)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: shll $2, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll __chkstk
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %esp, %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, 28(%esi) # 4-byte Spill
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal 32(%esi), %eax
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: subl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, (%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl 28(%esi), %eax # 4-byte Reload
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl %eax, (%esp)
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll _escape
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: addl $4, %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: movl 48(%esi), %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: xorl %ebp, %ecx
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: leal -4(%ebp), %esp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: popl %esi
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: popl %ebp
+; MSVC-X86-O0-NEXT: retl
+;
+; MSVC-X64-O0-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
+; MSVC-X64-O0: # %bb.0:
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: pushq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: pushq %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $72, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: andq $-32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rax, 64(%rbx)
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: # kill: def $rax killed $eax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq 15(,%rax,4), %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: andq $-16, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __chkstk
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq %rax, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rsp, %rax
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq %rax, 24(%rbx) # 8-byte Spill
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq 32(%rbx), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq 24(%rbx), %rcx # 8-byte Reload
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq escape
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: addq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: movq 64(%rbx), %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: xorq %rbp, %rcx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: subq $32, %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: leaq 8(%rbp), %rsp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: popq %rbx
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: popq %rbp
+; MSVC-X64-O0-NEXT: retq
%realign = alloca i32, align 32
%vla = alloca i32, i32 %n
call void @escape(ptr %realign)
@@ -73,45 +374,6 @@ define void @test_vla_realign(i32 %n) nounwind ssp {
ret void
}
-; MSVC-X86-LABEL: _test_vla_realign:
-; MSVC-X86: pushl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: movl %esp, %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: pushl %esi
-; MSVC-X86: andl $-32, %esp
-; MSVC-X86: subl $32, %esp
-; MSVC-X86: movl %esp, %esi
-; MSVC-X86: movl ___security_cookie, %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %ebp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X86: movl %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%esi)
-; MSVC-X86: calll __chkstk
-; MSVC-X86: pushl
-; MSVC-X86: calll _escape
-; MSVC-X86: movl [[SLOT]](%esi), %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: xorl %ebp, %ecx
-; MSVC-X86: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
-; MSVC-X86: leal -8(%ebp), %esp
-; MSVC-X86: popl %esi
-; MSVC-X86: popl %ebp
-; MSVC-X86: retl
-
-; MSVC-X64-LABEL: test_vla_realign:
-; MSVC-X64: pushq %rbp
-; MSVC-X64: pushq %rbx
-; MSVC-X64: subq $32, %rsp
-; MSVC-X64: leaq 32(%rsp), %rbp
-; MSVC-X64: andq $-32, %rsp
-; MSVC-X64: movq %rsp, %rbx
-; MSVC-X64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %[[REG1:[^ ]*]]
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %[[REG1]]
-; MSVC-X64: movq %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%rbx)
-; MSVC-X64: callq __chkstk
-; MSVC-X64: callq escape
-; MSVC-X64: movq [[SLOT]](%rbx), %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: xorq %rbp, %rcx
-; MSVC-X64: callq __security_check_cookie
-; MSVC-X64: retq
-
-
declare ptr @strcpy(ptr, ptr) nounwind
declare i32 @printf(ptr, ...) nounwind
>From 9dae0613c5be03a5338c4c6841ea73a3751c542f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:22:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] remove spaces added by merge/cleanup
---
llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
index 1328e0cfa7124..81b6c9882fd99 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/tailcc-ssp.ll
@@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ define tailcc void @tailcall_frame(ptr %0, i64 %1) sspreq {
; LINUX-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
; LINUX-NEXT: callq __stack_chk_fail@PLT
-
-
tail call tailcc void @h(ptr null, i64 0, ptr null)
ret void
}
@@ -76,7 +74,7 @@ define void @tailcall_unrelated_frame() sspreq {
; WINDOWS-NEXT: callq __security_check_cookie
; WINDOWS-NEXT: int3
; WINDOWS-NEXT: .seh_endproc
-;
+
; LINUX-LABEL: tailcall_unrelated_frame:
; LINUX: # %bb.0:
; LINUX-NEXT: pushq %rax
@@ -95,7 +93,6 @@ define void @tailcall_unrelated_frame() sspreq {
; LINUX-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
; LINUX-NEXT: callq __stack_chk_fail@PLT
-
call void @bar()
tail call void @bar()
ret void
>From 64dccfae3121d2b102a68ae4817c23af72884e0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:16:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] update coding conv
---
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
index d8c31e544d348..b1d0d19317a10 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
X86FixupStackProtectorPass::getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(MachineFunction &MF) {
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator RBegin, REnd;
for (auto &MBB : llvm::reverse(MF)) {
- for (RBegin = MBB.rbegin(), REnd = MBB.rend(); RBegin != REnd; RBegin++) {
+ for (RBegin = MBB.rbegin(), REnd = MBB.rend(); RBegin != REnd; ++RBegin) {
auto &MI = *RBegin;
if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::CALL64pcrel32 &&
MI.getNumExplicitOperands() == 1) {
@@ -104,22 +104,22 @@ void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::getGuardCheckSequence(
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator DIt(CheckCall);
// Seq From StackUp to Stack Down Is fixed.
// ADJCALLSTACKUP64
- UIt++;
+ ++UIt;
SeqMI[4] = &*UIt;
// CALL __security_check_cookie
SeqMI[3] = CheckCall;
// COPY function slot cookie
- DIt++;
+ ++DIt;
SeqMI[2] = &*DIt;
// ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64
- DIt++;
+ ++DIt;
SeqMI[1] = &*DIt;
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator XIt(SeqMI[1]);
- for (; XIt != CurMBB->rbegin(); XIt++) {
+ for (; XIt != CurMBB->rbegin(); ++XIt) {
auto &CI = *XIt;
if ((CI.getOpcode() == X86::XOR64_FP) || (CI.getOpcode() == X86::XOR32_FP))
break;
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
X86FixupStackProtectorPass::CreateFailCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB,
MachineInstr *GuardXor = SeqMI[0];
MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt(GuardXor);
- InsertPt++;
+ ++InsertPt;
// Compare security_Cookie with XOR_Val, if not same, we have violation
auto CMI = BuildMI(*CurMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::CMP64rm))
@@ -216,13 +216,13 @@ bool
X86FixupStackProtectorPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
// After Inserting JMP_1, we can not have two terminators
// in same block, split CurrentMBB after JMP_1
MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitIt(SeqMI[4]);
- SplitIt++;
+ ++SplitIt;
SplitBasicBlock(CurMBB, NewRetMBB, SplitIt);
// Fill up Failure Routine, move Fail Check Squence from CurMBB to FailMBB
MachineBasicBlock::iterator U1It(SeqMI[1]);
MachineBasicBlock::iterator U2It(SeqMI[4]);
- U2It++;
+ ++U2It;
FailMBB->splice(FailMBB->end(), CurMBB, U1It, U2It);
BuildMI(*FailMBB, FailMBB->end(), DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::INT3));
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ bool
X86FixupStackProtectorPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
// from Current Basic BLocks into New Return Block
JMI.addMBB(NewRetMBB);
MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplicePt(JMI.getInstr());
- SplicePt++;
+ ++SplicePt;
if (SplicePt != CurMBB->end())
NewRetMBB->splice(NewRetMBB->end(), CurMBB, SplicePt);
>From 5059849ff8cb471a306e57c2aa1e5fc8d9c1c615 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:37:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] update naming to X86 Windows related terms
---
llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h | 6 +-
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp | 2 +-
...cpp => X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp} | 55 ++++++++++---------
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
rename llvm/lib/Target/X86/{X86FixupStackProtector.cpp =>
X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp} (80%)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
index 5303758ff8a2e..02770b134d26c 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ set(sources
X86AvoidStoreForwardingBlocks.cpp
X86DynAllocaExpander.cpp
X86FixupSetCC.cpp
- X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
+ X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp
X86FloatingPoint.cpp
X86FrameLowering.cpp
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
index b4432f45987cd..d6e0d5e3a3b2c 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ FunctionPass *createX86OptimizeLEAs();
/// Return a pass that transforms setcc + movzx pairs into xor + setcc.
FunctionPass *createX86FixupSetCC();
-/// Return a pass that transform inline stack protector into seperate bb
-FunctionPass *createX86FixupStackProtectorPass();
+/// Return a pass that transform inline buffer security check into seperate bb
+FunctionPass *createX86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass();
/// Return a pass that avoids creating store forward block issues in the
hardware.
FunctionPass *createX86AvoidStoreForwardingBlocks();
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ void initializeX86ExpandPseudoPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86FastPreTileConfigPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86FastTileConfigPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86FixupSetCCPassPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeX86FixupStackProtectorPassPass(PassRegistry &);
+void initializeX86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPassPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86FlagsCopyLoweringPassPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86LoadValueInjectionLoadHardeningPassPass(PassRegistry &);
void initializeX86LoadValueInjectionRetHardeningPassPass(PassRegistry &);
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
index b245e80ad18dc..4c77f40fd32a3 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ bool X86PassConfig::addPreISel() {
void X86PassConfig::addPreRegAlloc() {
if (getOptLevel() != CodeGenOptLevel::None) {
addPass(&LiveRangeShrinkID);
- addPass(createX86FixupStackProtectorPass());
+ addPass(createX86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass());
addPass(createX86FixupSetCC());
addPass(createX86OptimizeLEAs());
addPass(createX86CallFrameOptimization());
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
similarity index 80%
rename from llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
rename to llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
index b1d0d19317a10..a5cea35f788e7 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupStackProtector.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
-//===---- X86FixupStackProtector.cpp Fix Stack Protector Call ----------===//
+//===---- X86FixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp Fix Buffer Security Check Call
+//----------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// Stack Protector implementation inserts platform specific callback into code.
-// For windows __security_check_cookie call gets call everytime function is
-// return without fixup. Since this function is defined in runtime library, it
-// incures cost of call in dll which simply does comparison and returns most
+// Buffer Security Check implementation inserts platform specific callback into
+// code. For windows __security_check_cookie call gets call everytime function
+// is return without fixup. Since this function is defined in runtime library,
+// it incures cost of call in dll which simply does comparison and returns most
// time. With Fixup, We selective move to call in DLL only if comparison fails.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
@@ -25,17 +26,19 @@
using namespace llvm;
-#define DEBUG_TYPE "x86-fixup-spcall"
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "x86-fixup-bscheck"
namespace {
-class X86FixupStackProtectorPass : public MachineFunctionPass {
+class X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass : public MachineFunctionPass {
public:
static char ID;
- X86FixupStackProtectorPass() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {}
+ X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {}
- StringRef getPassName() const override { return "X86 Fixup Stack Protector";
}
+ StringRef getPassName() const override {
+ return "X86 Fixup Buffer Security Check";
+ }
bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
@@ -44,7 +47,7 @@ class X86FixupStackProtectorPass : public MachineFunctionPass
{
void getGuardCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineInstr
*CheckCall,
MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]);
-
+
void SplitBasicBlock(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitIt);
@@ -58,23 +61,24 @@ class X86FixupStackProtectorPass : public
MachineFunctionPass {
};
} // end anonymous namespace
-char X86FixupStackProtectorPass::ID = 0;
+char X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::ID = 0;
-INITIALIZE_PASS(X86FixupStackProtectorPass, DEBUG_TYPE, DEBUG_TYPE, false,
- false)
+INITIALIZE_PASS(X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass, DEBUG_TYPE, DEBUG_TYPE,
+ false, false)
-FunctionPass *llvm::createX86FixupStackProtectorPass() {
- return new X86FixupStackProtectorPass();
+FunctionPass *llvm::createX86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass() {
+ return new X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass();
}
-void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::SplitBasicBlock(
+void X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::SplitBasicBlock(
MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitIt) {
NewRetMBB->splice(NewRetMBB->end(), CurMBB, SplitIt, CurMBB->end());
}
std::pair<MachineBasicBlock *, MachineInstr *>
-X86FixupStackProtectorPass::getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(MachineFunction &MF) {
+X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(
+ MachineFunction &MF) {
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator RBegin, REnd;
for (auto &MBB : llvm::reverse(MF)) {
@@ -96,7 +100,7 @@
X86FixupStackProtectorPass::getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(MachineFunction &MF) {
return std::make_pair(nullptr, nullptr);
}
-void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::getGuardCheckSequence(
+void X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::getGuardCheckSequence(
MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineInstr *CheckCall,
MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]) {
@@ -128,9 +132,9 @@ void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::getGuardCheckSequence(
}
std::pair<MachineInstr *, MachineInstr *>
-X86FixupStackProtectorPass::CreateFailCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB,
- MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB,
- MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]) {
+X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::CreateFailCheckSequence(
+ MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB,
+ MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]) {
auto MF = CurMBB->getParent();
@@ -162,13 +166,13 @@
X86FixupStackProtectorPass::CreateFailCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB,
return std::make_pair(CMI.getInstr(), JMI.getInstr());
}
-void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::FinishBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
+void X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::FinishBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
LivePhysRegs LiveRegs;
computeAndAddLiveIns(LiveRegs, *MBB);
}
-void X86FixupStackProtectorPass::FinishFunction(MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB,
- MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB) {
+void X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::FinishFunction(
+ MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB, MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB) {
FailMBB->getParent()->RenumberBlocks();
// FailMBB includes call to MSCV RT where is __security_check_cookie
// function is called. This function uses regcall and it expects cookie
@@ -179,7 +183,8 @@ void
X86FixupStackProtectorPass::FinishFunction(MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB,
FinishBlock(NewRetMBB);
}
-bool X86FixupStackProtectorPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
+bool X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::runOnMachineFunction(
+ MachineFunction &MF) {
bool Changed = false;
const X86Subtarget &STI = MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
>From bcdfdde19b1b205e0031d4e037116e9913c9f69f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde <mahesh.atta...@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:55:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] update comments and sorted file list
---
llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
index 02770b134d26c..9553a8619feb5 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ set(sources
X86AvoidStoreForwardingBlocks.cpp
X86DynAllocaExpander.cpp
X86FixupSetCC.cpp
- X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp
X86FloatingPoint.cpp
X86FrameLowering.cpp
@@ -84,6 +83,7 @@ set(sources
X86TargetTransformInfo.cpp
X86VZeroUpper.cpp
X86WinEHState.cpp
+ X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
X86InsertWait.cpp
GISel/X86CallLowering.cpp
GISel/X86InstructionSelector.cpp
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
index a5cea35f788e7..69271a89695fd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-//===---- X86FixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp Fix Buffer Security Check Call
-//----------===//
+//===---- X86FixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp Fix Buffer Security Check
Call---===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
