NagyDonat wrote: > Even protobuf contains this type of code: > https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/Default/report-detail?run=protobuf_v3.13.0_pointersub1&is-unique=on&diff-type=New&checker-name=alpha.core.PointerSub&report-id=5545776&report-hash=1bcd310fbaeccbcc13645b9b277239a2&report-filepath=%2adescriptor.pb.cc
I still think that this (1) is undeniably undefined behavior (2) isn't common, so won't cause "spam" problems and (3( can be replaced by standard-compliant code (`offsetof`) so there is no need to introduce a special case for it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96501 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
