ldrumm wrote:

Can you please include rationale for why this this name e.g. why not 
`__NVPTX_VERSION__`?
How does it relate to `__CUDA_ARCH__`, and why is `__CUDA_ARCH__` not 
sufficient?
Are there ever point releases that might mean we should max +ptx78 should 
actually expand to `780` rather than `78`?

Once a macro is defined - that's *it* ; it's there forever - so I'd like a bit 
more clarity on the decisions making even if only in your commit message 



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94934
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to