================
@@ -652,6 +652,134 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Transitive Change
----------------
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> I'd like to find a better term than "no transitive change" -- this doesn't
> work well as a noun phrase in English, so we say awkward things like "...the
> no transitive change feature can be more powerful if ..." I think what
> bothers me about is the "no" and "change" part -- "change" is a verb, so it
> comes out sounding verb-like and we end up tacking on "feature" to try to
> make it a noun again.
While I respect the feelings from native speakers, Google told me that `change`
can be a noun too. For the `no` part, may be we can use the term `less`? So
that the feature name become to `less transitive change`, which may be more
precise since there should always some changes are transitive.
> "no-cascade" feature?
I didn't know this word `cascade` before. I think it may be appropriate after I
searched it. I can replace with it if we're happy with that.
> "isolated BMI"
`isolated` may not be accurate. Since the BMI still depends on other BMIs.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96453
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
