jdenny-ornl wrote: > Makes sense overall. However in the future I'm looking to move away from the > home-baked LTO pipeline in favor of giving it to the linker. That allows me > to set up libraries as a part of the target toolchain in the driver. I guess > for that I'll just need to forward `-mllvm` to the internal clang invocation.
As long as there's some way to inject an LLVM pass plugin at link time (even if it requires -flto or -foffload-lto), that's fine. I don't know that a stable command-line interface is critical at this point. Of course, please ping me if it changes. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96704 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
