ilya-biryukov wrote: > Yeah, I think this patch may be conceptually good except the extra memory > using. But benchmarking, I tried it locally but didn't find observable > effects. So I'd like to land this after 19's branching to give it more baking > time.
Do you mean that no large increases in the memory use or that things are not getting faster either? If it's the latter, I would vouch for keeping the code as-is to avoid adding extra complexity. If this does lead to significant performance wins, though, it's a different story. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95506 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
