================
@@ -141,3 +141,15 @@ namespace r360308_regression {
return a == b;
}
}
+
+namespace GH95598 {
+template<typename _Tp, bool _IsPtr = __is_pointer(_Tp)>
+struct __is_pointer {};
+// expected-warning@-1 {{keyword '__is_pointer' will be made available as an
identifier for the remainder of the translation unit}}
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
@zygoloid I prototyped something https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097
One of the test has a default constructor declaration, ie `is_pod()`, which the
lexer approach would struggle to cope with. Let me know what you think
The alternative is to keep status quo or go with the current PR and change the
warning to a depreciation warning.
My concern is that until we support older libstdc++ (which will be the case for
a long time), we won't be able to rip the hack out
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95969
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
