================
@@ -3180,6 +3180,18 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, FunctionTryBlock) {
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[36], tok::l_brace, TT_FunctionLBrace);
}
+TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, TypenameMacro) {
+ auto Style = getLLVMStyle();
+ Style.TypenameMacros.push_back("STRUCT");
+
+ auto Tokens = annotate("STRUCT(T, B) { int i; };", Style);
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 13u);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[0], tok::identifier, TT_TypenameMacro);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[1], tok::l_paren, TT_TypeDeclarationParen);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::r_paren, TT_TypeDeclarationParen);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[6], tok::l_brace, TT_Unknown);
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
Is `TT_Unknown` the correct type? I know we can't really say if it's a
`TT_StructLBrace` or `TT_ClassLBrace` (or even `TT_UnionLBrace`), but would it
harm to just guess one of them?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96026
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
