NagyDonat wrote: > Consider replacing ":" separator with ","
I switched to ":" (instead of the ";" that was used previously) to emphasize that the second part of the message is an explanation/reason for the first part (and not a second, separate issue). However I can switch to "," or ";" if that option turns out to be more popular. @ rewiewers: Which symbol would you prefer in these messages? (My preferences are dot > keep the semicolon ≳ comma.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95550 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits