Veeloxfire wrote:

> It’s fine if you do. We do squash+merge anyway, so the entire pr will end up 
> as one commit either way ;Þ

Aha I didnt realise!

> seeing as we were already diagnosing this; the only thing that’s changed is 
> that we now also provide a fix-it.

I agree but also now it fully parses as if `typename` so that means code which 
previously did `template<template A> void foo(A)` will now parse `A` as a type 
(instead of skipping) and not error the second time for `A` not existing

This change isnt reflected in that, but I think its probably good enough and 
not worth worrying about

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95726
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to