malcolm.parsons added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27806#623856, @Prazek wrote:
> So does FIXIT comment satisfies you for this patch?
Yes.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/obvious/InvalidRangeCheck.cpp:80
+void InvalidRangeCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+
+ const auto *FirstArg = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<DeclRefExpr>("first_arg");
----------------
blank line at start of function.
================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-invalid-range.rst:1
+.. title:: clang-tidy - misc-invalid-range
+
----------------
misc.
================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/misc-invalid-range.cpp:1
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s misc-invalid-range %t
+
----------------
misc
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27806
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
