================
@@ -86,8 +86,14 @@ void riscv::getRISCVTargetFeatures(const Driver &D, const
llvm::Triple &Triple,
// and other features (ex. mirco architecture feature) from mcpu
if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mcpu_EQ)) {
StringRef CPU = A->getValue();
- if (CPU == "native")
+ if (CPU == "native") {
CPU = llvm::sys::getHostCPUName();
+ llvm::StringMap<bool> HostFeatures;
+ if (llvm::sys::getHostCPUFeatures(HostFeatures))
----------------
dtcxzyw wrote:
I think hwprobe is more reliable than cpu name because some RV cpus are not
recognized by LLVM (e.g., T-head's cores). However, cpu name is still useful
even if `getHostCPUFeatures` returns true because it may provide scheduling
model.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94352
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
