================
@@ -3328,3 +3300,63 @@ void clang::checkUnsafeBufferUsage(const Decl *D,
}
}
}
+
+void clang::checkUnsafeBufferUsage(const Decl *D,
+ UnsafeBufferUsageHandler &Handler,
+ bool EmitSuggestions) {
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+ Handler.clearDebugNotes();
+#endif
+
+ assert(D);
+
+ SmallVector<Stmt *> Stmts;
+
+ // We do not want to visit a Lambda expression defined inside a method
+ // independently. Instead, it should be visited along with the outer method.
+ // FIXME: do we want to do the same thing for `BlockDecl`s?
+ if (const auto *fd = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(D)) {
+ if (fd->getParent()->isLambda() && fd->getParent()->isLocalClass())
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Do not emit fixit suggestions for functions declared in an
+ // extern "C" block.
+ if (const auto *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D)) {
+ for (FunctionDecl *FReDecl : FD->redecls()) {
+ if (FReDecl->isExternC()) {
+ EmitSuggestions = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ Stmts.push_back(FD->getBody());
+
+ if (const auto *ID = dyn_cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(D)) {
+ for (const CXXCtorInitializer *CI : ID->inits()) {
+ Stmts.push_back(CI->getInit());
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (const auto *FD = dyn_cast<FieldDecl>(D)) {
----------------
danakj wrote:
Hm, I changed `MatchDescendantVisitor::shouldVisitImplicitCode()` to return
true, but that is not sufficient to resolve things for me. Did you try running
the tests in this PR with that change? If I
remove`CallableVisitor::VisitFieldDecl()`, I get 5 errors for missing
diagnostics still for all the field initializer test cases in
`clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsafe-buffer-usage-function-attr.cpp`
I will try out `TraverseCXXDefaultInitExpr()` and see what I can see.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91991
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
