ThomasRaoux wrote: > (If it's for MLIR support, I'd like to have a discussion there, since I don't > thisk these scalars belong in `FloatType` and that the long-term solution is > to allow arbitrary newtypes / tags on bits / ... up there)
I don't want to speak for the author but I'm interested in this support. I replied on your thread on discourse: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-should-the-ocp-microscaling-float-scalars-be-added-to-apfloat-and-floattype/77530/8 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94735 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits