arsenm wrote: > @arsenm You're right about passing larger things indirectly. I'm intending to > land this as-is, with the types inlined, as that unblocks #93362. I'm nervous > that the extra pointer indirection will hit the same memory error that > tweaking codegen in that patch hits (it's a similar sort of pattern to the > top level argument passing) and wish to postpone that until there is a > working baseline.
I do think we need to revisit some threshold at some point. We should use byref for anything that's most likely to hit the stack anyway https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94083 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
