================
@@ -36,6 +36,111 @@ void extractNodesByIdTo(ArrayRef<BoundNodes> Matches,
StringRef ID,
Nodes.insert(Match.getNodeAs<Node>(ID));
}
+// If `D` has a const-qualified overload with otherwise identical
+// ref-qualifiers, returns that overload.
+const CXXMethodDecl *findConstOverload(const CXXMethodDecl &D) {
+ assert(!D.isConst());
+
+ DeclContext::lookup_result lookup_result =
+ D.getParent()->lookup(D.getNameInfo().getName());
+ if (lookup_result.isSingleResult()) {
+ // No overload.
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+ for (const Decl *overload : lookup_result) {
+ const CXXMethodDecl *candidate = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(overload);
+ if (candidate && !candidate->isDeleted() && candidate->isConst() &&
+ candidate->getRefQualifier() == D.getRefQualifier()) {
----------------
fberger wrote:
It looks like we look up by name, do we also need to confirm that the return
types are the same, or would overloading otherwise not be allowed and that's
why it's implied?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94362
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
