4vtomat wrote:

> Could you give few more word on the description to mention we missed that in 
> the vector crpyto intrinsic proposal, and it's fixing but rather than 
> incompatible/breaking change for the intrinsic API?

Updated description. We are missing `vcpop.v` in the rvv_intrinsic_doc, so I 
think we don't break anything lol~

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94318
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to