dwblaikie wrote:

> I think the comment about `s/members/methods/` is still outstanding - I agree 
> that methods is more descriptive than members.

Yeah, seems I'm outvoted here. I'm a bit of a pedant for the C++ standard 
language, which doesn't talk about "methods", only "member functions". But 
anyway, since you're likeyl the first folks to use this, I've made that change 
toward "methods".

> I'm +1 on having this be non-default; adding it to SCE tuning is also not 
> necessary (or desired) for now, because this is more aggressive than our 
> private option (we keep entries for member functions that are called), and 
> we're still working out whether we can/should adopt this instead.

Yeah, no plans to make this the default any time soon - will start with it 
entirely off by default, and figured you Sony folks can see if it can be your 
default in the future - save you carrying the downstream patches, gives you 
some hope other folks might adopt the same strategy (& folks considering 
adopting it would have some reassurance that other people are living with 
it/interested in caring for it already)


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87018
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to