================
@@ -4944,6 +4944,26 @@ void Parser::ParseStructDeclaration(
}
}
+// TODO: All callers of this function should be moved to
+// `Parser::ParseLexedAttributeList`.
+void Parser::ParseLexedCAttributeList(LateParsedAttrList &LAs, bool EnterScope,
+ ParsedAttributes *OutAttrs) {
+ assert(LAs.parseSoon() &&
+ "Attribute list should be marked for immediate parsing.");
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+ auto LangStd = getLangOpts().LangStd;
+ if (LangStd != LangStandard::lang_unspecified) {
+ auto Lang = LangStandard::getLangStandardForKind(LangStd).getLanguage();
+ assert(Lang == Language::C || Lang == Language::OpenCL);
----------------
rapidsna wrote:
> That doesn't sound equivalent. The language could also be objective-C or
> objective-C++.
I think `getLangOpts().CPlusPlus` should set true when it is `Objective-C++`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93121
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
