cor3ntin wrote: > It was quite extensively discussed in > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184, but it wasn't deemed > necessary to go through RFC process for a non-functional change that doesn't > affect stable interfaces.
We had buy-in to split languages out and I think that has been successful (with painful churns). Splitting out individual C++ features or even C from C++ is a different proposition all together because these things are naturally interweaved, and we quickly get diminishing returns (and increased churns), at the cost of more clumsy APIs (ie things like `SemaAccess()` _everywhere_ and thing harder to find or organized) I think there are a lots of opportunities to remove some utilities objects out of Sema.h, move pragma handling etc which should be a bit more self contained before considering doing more surgery on C++ (and at some point we should pause and consider the impact of already done work) There are a lot of architectures specific functions that we might be able to move, if we want to? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92645 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
