================
@@ -94,19 +94,21 @@ static void EmitARMTargetDef(RecordKeeper &RK, raw_ostream 
&OS) {
     else
       OS << ", \"" << Alias << "\"";
     OS << ", AArch64::" << AEK;
-    if (AEK == "AEK_NONE") {
+    auto Name = Rec->getValueAsString("Name");
+    if (Name.empty()) {
----------------
labrinea wrote:

No, for example all the features I have fused  (FEAT_DPB, FEAT_DPB2, 
FEAT_FLAGM2, FEAT_FRINTTS, FEAT_RCPC2) as well as BTI, are FMVOnly and still 
have a valid +/- TargetFeatureName.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92319
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to