================ @@ -14638,6 +14649,8 @@ bool FloatExprEvaluator::VisitCallExpr(const CallExpr *E) { return true; } + case Builtin::BIfmin: + case Builtin::BIfminf: ---------------- hubert-reinterpretcast wrote:
At the Clang C/C++ Language Workgroup call on 2024-05-15, it was agreed that `-fno-builtin[-*]` should remain capable of disabling built-in treatment even when that treatment would be required for conformance w.r.t. `constexpr` behaviour of functions shared with C. For me, the first expectation for this PR (on that subject) is an update to the documentation of `-fno-builtin[-*]`. @AaronBallman @ldionne, I am no sure how we want to handle this w.r.t. documenting the C++23 implementation status. Does it go in both the Clang documentation (for the functions shared with C) and the libc++ documentation (for the overloads added by C++)? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits