================
@@ -14638,6 +14649,8 @@ bool FloatExprEvaluator::VisitCallExpr(const CallExpr
*E) {
return true;
}
+ case Builtin::BIfmin:
+ case Builtin::BIfminf:
----------------
hubert-reinterpretcast wrote:
At the Clang C/C++ Language Workgroup call on 2024-05-15, it was agreed that
`-fno-builtin[-*]` should remain capable of disabling built-in treatment even
when that treatment would be required for conformance w.r.t. `constexpr`
behaviour of functions shared with C.
For me, the first expectation for this PR (on that subject) is an update to the
documentation of `-fno-builtin[-*]`.
@AaronBallman @ldionne, I am no sure how we want to handle this w.r.t.
documenting the C++23 implementation status. Does it go in both the Clang
documentation (for the functions shared with C) and the libc++ documentation
(for the overloads added by C++)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits