================
@@ -1006,6 +1006,8 @@ static void InitializePredefinedMacros(const TargetInfo
&TI,
else if (LangOpts.hasDWARFExceptions() &&
(TI.getTriple().isThumb() || TI.getTriple().isARM()))
Builder.defineMacro("__ARM_DWARF_EH__");
+ else if (LangOpts.hasWasmExceptions() && TI.getTriple().isWasm())
+ Builder.defineMacro("__USING_WASM_EXCEPTIONS__");
----------------
aheejin wrote:
I see. And come to think of it, as you said, I may not need to worry about the
predefined macros in other users because they might be redundant but this will
not break them because we define the macro in Clang.
Will update this to `__WASM_EXCEPTIONS__`, and update the macro in other parts
of LLVM and Emscripten as follow-ups.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92604
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
