Endilll wrote: > It might violate https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.inst#11 to attempt to > instantiate the unused S::operator int<int>?
I don't think this clause of the standard is violated: you need to instantiate a declaration of the conversion function to at the end of definition of `M`, otherwise you can't "determine the correctness of the default member initializer" in `int x = S();`; https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
